Anonyme a demandé: But you've just proved my point, they're putting their need for belonging and self acceptance over the basic need of nourishment... it's not so much availability that matters, but fulfilling that need. Even if you have the food, it doesn't matter if you don't use it, you're putting other needs before the basic physiological need of nourishment and therefore Maslow's theory is flawed...

So, it has come to this.

But they could not have put those needs over the need for nourishment if they had not first achieved nourishment. You can’t decide not to watch tv if you don’t have a tv. But anyway did you even read my edit bye now

02:21 am, BY dbkarp